Select Page

I don’t use the term lightly. It sounds harsh because it is harsh. I confess there’s something about avoiding premature, preventable death that brings out the judgement in me. 

Its a shame that differing opinions on protecting ourselves from Covid continues on a similarly divisive track that politics has for the last several years. I do not speak entirely for the camps on both sides here. There are always odd exceptions of mixed breeds among us, but as far as I can tell so far, a sizable amount of Conservative and Trumper sympathies are also very gung-ho about going back to eating INSIDE restaurants, gathering among groups of vaccinated or non-vaccinated, and cheerfully eager to drop their masks and make believe things are normal again. The problem is, things are not normal, and saying they are doesn’t make it so. Nor does a politically pressured state governor have a right to say it is by rolling back restrictions or lockdowns. If anyone doesn’t realize the political pressure put on state Governors right now, in spite of medical evidence urging caution, they are burying their heads, or don’t know politics. Again, see above post title.

It’s one thing trying to analyze certain (mostly Florida?) spring breakers, who by ritual indoctrination, get possessed to risk any and every thing for the sake of boozing themselves to unconsciousness, having sex with anyone who looks sideways at them, to proving they know how to define a party at any cost. Its quite another thing  to observe the adults doing something that is, while much quieter, also risky.

There are people taking the reopening edicts and their holstered vaccines as a racehorse does at the track when the steel gate flies open for them. “And they’re off!” They can’t wait to do something normal, and they go for it when the first authority figure gives their permission. The problem is, there should only be one type of authority figure here to guide us, Health and medical authority figures. No businessman. No friend or family members. And definitely, no politician. 

If you want to know the risk for Covid right now outside a household or controlled bubble, the answer is not radically different than it was six months ago. This goes even if you’ve already been vaccinated. Read it again. It goes even if you’re vaccinated. For some reason, there is a real tone deafness among the populous that doesn’t seem able to understand the language and word choices coming from every public health official, virologist, and virtually all medical professionals right now. For some reason, there is a deafness in the populous to the warnings of the threats of the emerging and established variants.

I get the fatigue. But we’ve come a long way to get here. What’s the rush now? Why is it so necessary to lunge back into the fray while we’re still in the hot middle of this mess? The sun can and will come out. We can not blow the clouds away before they’re ready to blow away. There is still a serious viral overcast. Why is it so imperative right now to open and run into the restaurant where many servers and others remain unvaccinated. 

There is no free ticket to immunity here. Even with the vaccines. The variants have already shown concerning resistance. People have gotten reinfected with and without vaccines. There are people with good immune systems who have gotten infected, gone on ventilators, and died. There are many explainable deaths and sickness from Covid. There are also plenty of unexplainable deaths and sickness. Try reading some of those stories, instead of just talking about the elderly and infirm nursing homes victims.

Listen to the national health spokespeople and professional medical consensus, and then blend it with some common sense. Sure this is all hard. It’s been a year. I choose to look at things from the other side. Its actually not been that long a time. And it actually is quite easy. 

>MB 

“You have decreases in cases and deaths when you wear masks, and you have increases in cases and deaths when you have in-person restaurant dining,” Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky, the director of the C.D.C., said on Friday.
Daily infections rose about six weeks after counties allowed restaurants to open for dining on the premises, and death rates followed two months later.
Even if restaurants limit capacity, however, aerosolized virus may accumulate if ventilation is inadequate, Dr. Allen said.
“It doesn’t really matter if it’s a restaurant, spin class, a gym, a choir practice — if you’re indoors with no masks, or no ventilation, we know that’s higher risk,” he said. “Respiratory aerosols build up indoors. It’s that simple. This is a real problem for restaurants.”

The Virus Spread Where Restaurants Reopened or Mask Mandates Were Absent

C.D.C. researchers found that coronavirus infections and death rates rose in U.S. counties permitting in-person dining or not requiring masks.


“You have decreases in cases and deaths when you wear masks, and you have increases in cases and deaths when you have in-person restaurant dining,” Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the C.D.C. director, said Friday.Credit…Ringo H.W. Chiu/Associated Press


Even as officials in Texas and Mississippi lifted statewide mask mandates, researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Friday offered fresh evidence of the importance of face coverings, reporting that mask-wearing mandates were linked to fewer infections with the coronavirus and Covid-19 deaths in counties across the United States.

Federal researchers also found that counties opening restaurantsfor on-premises dining — indoors or outdoors — saw a rise in daily infections about six weeks later, and an increase in Covid-19 death rates about two months later.

The study does not prove cause and effect, but the findings square with other research showing that masks prevent infection and that indoor spaces foster the spread of the virus through aerosols, tiny respiratory particles that linger in the air.

“You have decreases in cases and deaths when you wear masks, and you have increases in cases and deaths when you have in-person restaurant dining,” Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky, the director of the C.D.C., said on Friday. “And so we would advocate for policies, certainly while we’re at this plateau of a high number of cases, that would listen to that public health science.”

On Friday night, the National Restaurant Association, which represents one million restaurants and food service outlets, criticized the C.D.C. study as “an ill-informed attack on the industry hardest-hit by the pandemic.” It pointed out that researchers had not controlled for factors other than restaurant dining — such as business closures and other policies — that might have contributed to coronavirus infections and deaths.

“If a positive correlation between ice cream sales and shark attacks is found, that would not mean that ice cream causes shark attacks,” the association said in a statement.

The group also faulted federal researchers for not measuring compliance with safe operating protocols, and it noted that the research did not distinguish between indoor dining or outdoor dining, nor whether restaurants had adhered to distancing recommendations or had adequate ventilation.

“It is irresponsible to pin the spread of Covid-19 on a single industry,” the association said.

The findings come as city and state officials nationwide grapple with growing pressure to reopen schools and businesses amid falling rates of new cases and deaths. Officials have recently permitted limited indoor dining in New York City. On Thursday, Connecticut’s governor said the state would be ending capacity limits later this month on restaurants, gyms and offices. Masks are still required in both locales.

“The study is not surprising,” said Joseph Allen, an associate professor at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health and director of the university’s Healthy Buildings program. “What’s surprising is that we see some states ignoring all of the evidence and opening up quickly, and removing mask mandates and opening full dining.”

Other researchers said the new study confirmed the idea that viral transmission often takes place through the air, that physical distancing may not be sufficient to halt the spread in some settings, and that masks at least partly block airborne particles.

President Biden’s health advisers have said in recent days that now is not the time to relax. As of Thursday, the seven-day average of new cases was still 62,924 a day, according to a database maintained by The New York Times.

While that figure is down 14 percent from two weeks earlier, new cases remain near the peaks reported last summer. Though fatalities have started falling, in part because of the vaccination campaigns at nursing homes, it remains routine for 2,000 deaths to be reported in a single day.

Mr. Biden on Wednesday criticized the decisions by the governors of Texas and Mississippi to lift statewide mask mandates and reopen businesses without restrictions, calling the plans “a big mistake” that reflected “Neanderthal thinking.”

The president, who has asked Americans to wear masks during his first 100 days in office, said it was critical for public officials to follow the guidance of doctors and public health leaders as the coronavirus vaccination campaign gains momentum. As of Thursday, about 54 million people had received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine.

“It may seem tempting, in the face of all of this progress, to try to rush back to normalcy as if the virus is in the rearview mirror,” Andy Slavitt, a White House adviser on the pandemic, said on Friday. “It’s not.”

Diners in San Antonio on Wednesday. Credit…Eric Gay/Associated Press

C.D.C. researchers examined the associations between mask mandates, indoor or outdoor restaurant dining, and coronavirus infections and deaths last year between March 1 and Dec. 31. The agency relied on county-level data from state government websites and measured daily percentage change in coronavirus cases and deaths.

Infections and deaths declined after counties mandated mask use, the agency found. Daily infections rose about six weeks after counties allowed restaurants to open for dining on the premises, and death rates followed two months later.

The report’s authors concluded that mask mandates were linked to statistically significant decreases in coronavirus cases and death rates within 20 days of implementation. On-premises dining at restaurants, indoors or outdoors, was associated with rising case and death rates 41 to 80 days after reopenings.

“State mask mandates and prohibiting on-premises dining at restaurants help limit potential exposure to SARS-CoV-2, reducing community transmission of Covid-19,” the authors wrote.

Shortly after publishing the report, the C.D.C. amended it, urging establishments that resume serving diners to follow agency guidelines for reducing transmission in restaurants.

“The message is, if restaurants are going to open for on-premise dining, it’s important to follow C.D.C. guidelines to do so safely and effectively,” said Gery P. Guy, a scientist with the C.D.C.’s Covid response team and the study’s corresponding author.

That includes “everything from having staff stay home when they show signs of Covid or have tested positive or been in contact with someone who has Covid, and requiring masks among employees as well as customers who are not actively eating or drinking,” Dr. Guy said.

Other steps include adequate ventilation, options to eat outdoors, spacing customers six feet apart, encouraging frequent hand washing, and sanitizing of surfaces that are touched a lot, such as cash registers or pay terminals, door handles and tables.

Even if restaurants limit capacity, however, aerosolized virus may accumulate if ventilation is inadequate, Dr. Allen said.

“It doesn’t really matter if it’s a restaurant, spin class, a gym, a choir practice — if you’re indoors with no masks, low or no ventilation, we know that’s higher risk,” he said. “Respiratory aerosols build up indoors. It’s that simple. This is a real problem for restaurants.”

Linsey Marr, an expert on aerosol transmission at Virginia Tech, said Americans could not be expected to follow all the latest science, and so many simply rely on what is open or closed as an indicator of what is safe.

But indoor dining is particularly risky, she added. People typically sit in a restaurant for an hour or more and don’t wear masks while eating, leaving them vulnerable to airborne virus.

“Limiting capacity will help reduce the risk of transmission, but indoor dining is still a high-risk activity until more people are vaccinated,” she said.

Restaurant workers are particularly exposed. While they can wear masks, diners do not, reducing protection against the virus. And workers spend many hours inside with every shift, Dr. Allen said.

He recommended that restaurant workers double-mask, wearing a surgical mask covered by a cloth mask, or buy high-efficiency masks like N95s, typically reserved for health care workers, or KN95 or KF94 masks, taking steps to assure they are not counterfeit.

“Now is not the time to let our guard down and pull back on the controls when we’re so close to having a lot of people vaccinated,” Dr. Allen said.

Eileen Sullivan contributed reporting.