Select Page

Alcohol and Cancer Risk


I still drink, but way less than I used to. I started gradually to move away from it some two years ago. I love a good red, but more than a glass is a rarity for me these days. Martinis? Mixed drinks? Beer? Love’em all, but I just get plastered so easily with two or more of anything, that, I started wondering, what am I doing this to myself for? I feel better without the levels I used to consume. Better 24/7.

I think the research and connections are coherent. The risk is there, and I think it is better to err on the side of caution all around. Alcohol is a toxin. Plain and simple.

Sooo, after you read the NIH guidelines, what this means is, almost every martini is going to count as two drinks, and, you can bet the farm that any glass of wine you pour yourself at home will count as two drinks. Read on and then ask yourself if you are considered a moderate or heavy drinker? Whaaahahahahaha! 😀 😀


According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, a standard alcoholic drink in the United States contains 14.0 grams (0.6 ounces) of pure alcohol. Generally, this amount of pure alcohol is found in

  • 12 ounces of beer
  • 8-9 ounces of malt liquor
  • 5 ounces of wine
  • 1.5 ounces, or a “shot,” of 80-proof distilled spirits (liquor)

These amounts are used by public health experts in developing health guidelines about alcohol consumption and to provide a way for people to compare the amounts of alcohol they consume. However, they may not reflect the typical serving sizes people may encounter in daily life.

According to the federal government’s Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015-2020, individuals who do not drink alcohol should not start drinking for any reason. It recommends that if alcohol is consumed, it should be done in moderation and defines moderate alcohol drinking as up to one drink per day for women and up to two drinks per day for men. Heavy alcohol drinking is defined as having 4 or more drinks on any day or 8 or more drinks per week for women and 5 or more drinks on any day or 15 or more drinks per week for men. Binge drinking is defined as consuming 4 or more drinks for women and 5 or more drinks for men in one sitting (typically in about 2 hours).

For the rest of this from the NIH>National Cancer Institute website, click here>

Anthony Bourdain, Chef and Gifted Storyteller

Anthony Bourdain, Chef and Gifted Storyteller


Anthony Bourdain was a refreshing breakaway from the huge crop of foodie chefs that rained down on restaurant and eating culture from the 1990s on.
For nearly twenty years after retiring from the grinding restaurant business, he lived his loves of food, travel, writing, and pushing boundaries, as an edgy poet eager to say anything, and everything he felt about the small, and large world around him.
Bourdain contributed volumes of eloquence and insight from the many roads of life he traveled. His steady TV presence kept me company over many meals inspired by his passion, as did his cultural narratives that lulled me to sleep dreaming of following his footsteps. I will miss every bit of this… a lot.
Maybe what I will miss most is the gift of his desire simply to share it all with us. 😔


Related: https://www.npr.org/…/anthony-bourdain-chef-and-television-…Anthony

Judges Take Up Big Soda’s Suit To Abolish Philadelphia’s Sugar Tax

An appeals court hears arguments Wednesday on the future of Philly’s landmark tax on sweetened drinks. The money is funding preschool for low-income kids, but the soda industry says it’s losing jobs.

In observing those people who are directly involved in the sales and distribution of zero nutrition sugar drinks and soda, I find them similar to people involved in the economies of the fossil fuels industry.

People who gain income or revenue from one, or the other, are a contributing factor to making our planet dirty, and polluted, or, they are a contributing factor to an unhealthy and damaging diet of the planet’s inhabitants. Those who disagree with this statement, probably question the dangers of climate change, pollution, or, sugar in our diet, even though solid facts are established on all of them. So, in dealing with facts, let’s put those people who deny them, aside.

The arguments against cutting back on fossil fuels and sugary drink distribution, whether it be by reduced funding, tariffs, or legislation, are always the same. Job and revenue loss. That puts the decision to cuts on a different plane. A higher purpose…..


Sugar Industry Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat


A newly discovered cache of internal documents reveals that the sugar industry downplayed the risks of sugar in the 1960s. – Luis Ascui/Getty Images


Fifty years of misleading and dishonest research. Imagine how different things might be with public health and education if these bogus research papers weren’t given the credibility they received.

The second to last paragraph from the NPR article below says it all. Funding sources need to be screened for industry research projects and then governed for access to leading journals for publication. It wasn’t done fifty years ago, and it still isn’t done today. Why not? Why don’t leading journal publishers recognize the possibilty of crossing ethically gray territory, and simply refuse to print studies from researchers that are funded from the same industries they are writing about?

The same goes for the researchers. Why do they as individuals fail to exercise any restraint in turning down these projects, based on ethical grounds, even though it’s often so easy to anticipate the dubious results? Are the researchers just too stupid and naiive? I don’t think so. There’s a lot of people who just want to get paid, or make more money, publicize their name on a byline, pad their research dossier, or protect their power, or market position. They may be professionals, but their ethical boundaries often become vague if it means choosing a large research grant. I’m tired of describing this type of human failure. Feel free to draw your own conclusions.

Read the full article> 50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat